Most fake-news lessons hand students a checklist. This one teaches the step the checklist skips — say what the post is actually claiming — and then the check that works, which is leaving the website to see what independent sources say about it. Three complete lessons, ending with what to do before you share.
● Instant download · Lifetime access · Editable & print-ready
Three steps, in the order a person actually needs them: say what the post claims, check who is behind it, then decide what to do with it. Day 1 is the step almost every other lesson skips. Before you can check anything you have to know what is being claimed, so students restate a claim in their own words and learn that a headline can say more than the article under it without either one being false. They also learn which sentences cannot be checked at all — a prediction, an opinion, or a claim too vague to pin down.
Day 2 teaches the check that works. Everything on a website was chosen by the people who made it: the About page, the byline, the credentials, the design. The domain ending only says who could register the address. The checks that tell you something make you leave the site, which is lateral reading. Day 3 is about sharing, and it hands students three choices rather than two — send it, hold it, or send it with a line saying where it came from — plus how to write a correction that names what was wrong.
Each day runs the same way: a bell ringer (5 minutes), guided notes off the deck (13), the activity where the learning actually happens (20), and an exit ticket on the way out (7). Everything follows the same open-and-teach folders as the rest of the line: 00 Start Here / 01 Present / 02 Student Handouts / 03 Scenarios / 04 Activities / 05 Assessment / 06 Answer Keys. Every student page uses short, complete sentences, so students at every reading level can follow along.
A volunteer board publishes a report about its town's ball fields. The board is a real, steady group and the report is careful — and one part of it still says more than the board's own record counts. Students find the one sentence Maria cannot print, which is the sharpest idea in the unit: a trustworthy source can still say more than it checked. Keyed with a model answer for every question.
Page one of four real files out of the download, exactly as they print.
Twelve slides a day, low text, with the icons and layouts built as editable shapes rather than flat images. Recolor them to match your room, or delete any of them.
Two pages a day with the word bank printed at the top, ten blanks to fill as the deck goes by, and a REMEMBER box at the end. Editable Word and print-ready PDF, and every one has a complete key.
Two long-form cases about towns and people who do not exist. Students read the actual documents, find the sentence the record does not support, and write the correction that names what was wrong.
Students pick the label and then write the reason it fits, so the page is an argument rather than a fill-in-the-blank. Nothing to cut out and nothing to laminate.
Every other lesson starts at “check your sources.” This one starts a step earlier — say in your own words what the post is actually claiming — because you cannot check a claim nobody has named yet.
Every written question ships with what to look for, a model answer, and a line that says when to give the point.
Every activity was costed against real reading and writing rates. Each day is 5 minutes of bell ringer, 13 of slides and notes, 20 of activity and 7 of exit ticket, and every day fits a 45-minute period with time to spare.
Written for a general-education class — digital citizenship, English, social studies, advisory or technology. Nothing to prepare beyond hitting print, and every day stands alone as a sub plan.
Every post, website, person and place in the unit is made up, so no page names or judges a real news source. The examples are school-scale on purpose rather than national news.
Print-ready PDFs plus four self-grading Google Forms™ for the quiz and all three exit tickets.
Reviews help me a lot, and they help other teachers pick the right resources for their classes. It takes about a minute.
Leave a reviewInstant download right after checkout. You get editable PowerPoint and Word, print-ready PDF of everything, and the links for the self-grading Google Forms™.
Yes. Each day has a plan, the speaker notes tell you what to say, and every page has a key. The READ FIRST guide says exactly what to print and in what order.
No. Every post, website, person and place in the unit is made up, so no page judges a real source. The examples are school-scale on purpose — a town's report on its own ball fields, not national news.
After the three lessons, not inside them. The quiz is about 25 minutes and all three periods are full lessons, so run it as a Day 4 in class or set it as homework with the Google Form. Either way you already have a grade for every student from the three exit tickets.
It is a general-education digital-literacy unit, so it maps onto reading standards rather than a computer science framework: CCSS RI.9-10.8 and RI.9-10.1 with its 11-12 equivalent, plus ISTE 1.3.b and ISTE 1.2.b, every code checked against its official wording. A Skills Map is included, plus a page of step-by-step directions and a ready-to-paste AI prompt for finding your own state's codes.
Yes. The Digital Citizenship Unit Bundle holds this unit plus seven more — 27 teaching days in one download, and it costs less than buying the units one at a time.