Most lessons on this stop at be kind online, which leaves students with nothing to say when a post is cruel but is not bullying. Four complete days that give them three names and a test for each one, then the steps that fit what they named. Written for a general-education class and ready to print.
● Instant download · Lifetime access · Editable & print-ready
Four days that start by naming the thing. Day 1 gives students three names and a separate test for each: digital drama is an online fight between evenly matched people, cyberbullying needs all three of unwanted, repeated and a power imbalance, and hate speech attacks people for a group they belong to. It also allows a fourth answer most lessons never do — not enough information — so students learn to name the one question they would need answered instead of guessing.
Day 2 explains why cruelty is easier online through three dials — anonymity, lag, missing cues — and immediately draws the line the explanation invites: an explanation says why something was easier, an excuse says it was not your fault, and the person who posted it is still responsible. Day 3 is the civics day, and it is unusually precise for a high school unit: a public school is part of the government, so it cannot punish an opinion, but it can act on conduct, even when the post was made at home. There is no exact rule for off-campus posts, so students draw their own line on a grid and compare it with a partner's.
Day 4 is what to do. Eight steps, starting with saving a record, and every step paired with its limit — what it cannot do. Everything follows the same open-and-teach folders as the rest of the line: 00 Start Here / 01 Present / 02 Student Handouts / 03 Scenarios / 04 Activities / 05 Assessment / 06 Answer Keys, and every student page uses short, complete sentences.
Nadia and Cole have posted about each other for three weeks after a group project fell apart, so the school's peer helpers call it digital drama: both are posting, both are upset. Then the counselor's note adds what the thread cannot show — most of the grade follows Cole and a large chat reshares everything he posts, while Nadia's answers reach her cousin and a few friends. The answer flips. It is the unit's best argument for looking past what a thread shows.
Page one of four real files out of the download, exactly as they print.
Twelve slides a day, low text, with the icons and layouts built as real shapes rather than flat images. Recolor them to match your room, or delete any of them.
One page per day with a word bank of that day's ten terms and real room to write. Editable Word and print-ready PDF, and every one has a complete key.
Three long-form cases, two pages each, worth 3 points, with the trusted-adult line printed on page 1. Every person, school and post in them is invented.
Day 4 runs in two parts: name three cases and write the first three steps in order, then match each of the eight steps to its limit. Two of the offered limits are false for every step, and finding them is the point.
Cyberbullying isn't just drama that went too far. Students get a separate test for digital drama, cyberbullying and hate speech, and they use the evidence before they pick.
A thread cannot show whether somebody wants it to stop. Students learn to name the one question they would need answered instead of guessing at it.
Day 4 pairs all eight steps with what that step cannot do. Blocking doesn't delete a post, and reporting doesn't prove who typed the message.
Every written question ships with what to look for, a model response, and what else to accept or reject.
Every person, school and post is made up, and no task asks students to share their own experiences. No story ends in a death or a self-harm act.
Print-ready PDFs plus five self-grading Google Forms™ for the quiz and all four exit tickets.
Reviews help me a lot, and they help other teachers pick the right resources for their classes. It takes about a minute.
Leave a reviewInstant download right after checkout. You get editable PowerPoint and Word, print-ready PDF of everything, and the links for the self-grading Google Forms™.
No. Each day has a plan and the speaker notes tell you what to say. The READ FIRST guide says exactly what to print and when, and every page has a key.
The teacher guide carries a crisis line on the Start Here page and again on the safety page, and the safety page says who in your own school to go to. It never asks a teacher to decide whether a student is at risk. No task asks students to share their own experiences, and no story in the unit ends in a death or a self-harm act.
It is a civics day, and it is precise rather than vague. A public school cannot punish an opinion, but it can act on conduct, even when the post was made at home. The unit says plainly that there is no exact rule for off-campus posts, so students place five posts on a grid and draw their own line, with one fixed point: a threat always goes inside the line and always to an adult.
It sits after the four lessons, not inside them. The quiz is about 25 minutes and all four periods are full lessons. Run it as a Day 5 in class or set it as a take-home with the Google Form. Either way you already have a grade for every student from the four exit tickets.
It is a general-education unit, so it maps onto reading and speaking standards alongside health and ISTE codes rather than a computer science framework: RI.9-10.1 and SL.9-10.1 with the 11-12 equivalents, Health 2.12.1, 4.12.3 and 5.12.4 in the 2024 wording with the 2007 equivalents, and ISTE 1.2.b. The Skills Map lists what students learn each day, with every code checked against its official wording, plus a ready-to-paste prompt for your own state.
Yes. The Digital Citizenship Unit Bundle holds this unit and seven more — 27 teaching days and 279 files in one download, for less than buying them one at a time.